How does fascism differ from communism

Communist and Fascist are both evil. This paper makes communism sound like peace on Earth and that is not the case. Communism has different levels of wealth and that will never change in any country no matter what they are Republic, Democracy, Fascism, Communism.

Communists are human just like anyone else and the government there is not questioned. Everyone is only equal in the sense that they better not break the rules.

It was actually sad that we were allies with Russia in the second world war. We should have let Germany and Russia kill each other off. I bet others thought the same during the Cold War. Democracy puts the state above the citizens by keeping the country poor and using that money to build military might. Incommunism very few are poor as compared to fascism where only the state is very rich than every body else which is not good in the eyes of the lord!

History proves it, Communism works every time…… OK some of the time…. But hey, it has only killed over ,, people in 60 years many of them unarmed civilians so hey! You know, it actually seems as though China may pull it off. Most live in desperate poverty while the elite live in posh luxury, ruling over and using people as possessions to be used to make money. Hmmm, guess some folks are more equal than others? Communism is like any other government format. Sounds awesome in theory but, bad in practice.

A constitutional republic is the best government, the piece of paper is all that stands between us and anarchy. The U. S is not a Republic, Social Democracy, Democracy, nor a Constitutional Republic although very close The first three have no constitution which we follow and the last has no separation of powers within the government. The correct answer would be a Constitutional Federal Republic- the federal indicated a state and national government sovereign of each other.

In theory Communism a economic system sounds very good to someone who is socialist which i am not supporting nor denying its their choice. In communism like said above there is no difference in wealth between he who rules the country by whatever mean again Communism is an economic practice and the lowest worker. Yes the government owns all public property but there is an enormous gap in wealth between the workers and the elites. Which goes against the fundamental idea of communism. Fascism is again an economic practice.

In this system the government runs everything. Where in communism the government may let private CEO run the actual business. In fascism the government has department to actually run the business. The government keeps all of the money and the people are left with what ever the government set the wages as. In Fascism a doctor or what ever elite can still make more than a lowly worker depends what the government sets the wages as but everything whichever worker does the government is regulating it.

No one can predict it with a high chance of success, but there need to be some foundation to build on or even use of common sense when people want more spending on their favorite programs while less taxes for them. We need i get it that people might be suffering but constantly looking there the freakn Hubble telescope for the littlest problems to shout out at the top of our lungs the instant they occur ignoring everything good that happened is unreasonable. I would prefer if the government was a little more centralized my personal opinion that way we might be able to get things done in this country instead of arguing about it.

Libertarians are inherent anarchists — they believe in a small or non-existent government. However, this sort of thought tends to create a situation such as Somalia, which is a state of pure anarchy people and companies may do as they will without regulation.

Socialism: Labor controls wealth. For the record, Sweden has the highest standard of living in the world. Communism: State controls wealth. State is run by the people ostensibly. The system is supposed to be a collectivist system where workers are organized under their own free will, to maximize output and to guarantee security and safety.

Modern day feudalism, run by the workers instead of nobility. This is not normally how it happens, however. Soviet Union P. China though China is drifting towards Fascism Yugoslavia under Tito. Stalinism: State controls wealth.

State is run by one man, but runs it in the name of the people. Ostensibly Communist, but actual examples were not for the people or following socialist or Communist ideals. Rather close to Fascism. Soviet Union under Stalin Cuba P. China under Mao. Fascism: State controls wealth via companies. State Capitalism. The state is more important than the people, the people are expected to sacrifice themselves for the greater good the state. National Socialism Nazism : Fascism, but with greater emphasis on state control of wealth.

Libertarianism: The belief in a lack of government, or an extremely limited government. Practical anarchy. People and by extension businesses are free to do as they please, governed only by profit and self-materialism. Although popular in the USA today, this system has failed in the past — the US was heavily Libertarian in the 19th century when it was simply called Liberalism, due to the change in Politico-Economic terminology , which caused several large companies to dominate the landscape, until the beginning of the 20th century and the beginning of government intervention.

Somalia would ostensibly be considered libertarian, as it completely lacks a stable central government. Somalia today. Social Democratism: Large government.

Government is a democracy, usually of centralized nature. The government fully handles welfare, has national healthcare and national education. People are provided for, albeit via heavy taxes. Democratic Socialism: Social Democratism taken further. The government is still a democracy, however the government has far more control over the economy. Germany Austria. Social Capitalism: Government regulation and some control over the economy. There is some level of welfare, but many systems such as healthcare and education are privatized.

This is the US today. Libertarians want to move it towards practical anarchy and deregulation. State Capitalism: The forefather to Fascism and Communism.

The state controls, either directly or indirectly, the economy of the country. Russia today China moving towards this. The population is divided among blood-related clans, and these clans have hierarchy and alliegances. The state must then return the power to the people, which seems to be where most communist and fascist movments falter. I would instead say that it is our own human corruptability and incompetance that is the problem. To say that the anarchic system of capitalism and the inefficient process of democracy are good when compared to totalitarianism is fine, but to say they are good as an absolute is preposterous.

I agree completely. A person may be knowledgeable and know how to make things work, but may also be greedy. Even if someone is very knowledgeable and also very good at heart, some unexpected event may cause their plan not to work as intended. It gets even more complicated when you throw in millions of people who are all trying to persuade others into supporting what they believe and having no easy way to really know what is truthful. There is no such thing as a Communist country—it is theory.

A theory based upon the absurd notion of the innate goodness of mankind. The kind of theory soundly rejected by our founding fathers. We need to disabuse ourselves of the goodness of Socialism since we are headed full steam into it. Wake up America. All of which is exactly what the present U. Why is it so terribly difficult for the present private insolvent de-facto foreign controlled and thus highly-colorable Corporate Organization of International Political Means of rogue and feudal character and habit;d.

This is a poor article with obvious bias. The other commenters covered the main problems. No need to rehash. Marxism is derived from Hegelian dialectics. Hegel was nothing if he was not a fascist. Marxists just coopted him and turned him into one. How ironic that the Soviet Union was the ultimate Hegelian Marxist conceptualization… I hope you understand why. The truth is this: Fascism is a perpetual socialist form. Whereas communism is the desired end result of the socialist process, explained through Hegelian dialectics.

Fascism is that which encompasses ALL of the evils of Marxism, with none of the bogus promises of a communism that never comes. Marxists are idiots, despite the pseudo intellectual mumbo jumbo they are always spouting. Hello people I consider myself a bit of a Marxist. However what I am about to say is not biased in any way simply the truth.

I think you people have capitalism and democracy completely confused and switched around. The real debate is between communism and capitalism, as they are to different economic ideology not specifically how to run a country.

For example you can have a communist democracy it would be just people voting for the communist party that they support, rather than the capitalist party they support as we do today in most countries.

So really comparing communism to democracy is just pointless. I urge you people to have a look at the communist manifesto by Karl Marx and come back and say that the idea for a free and classless society were we are not imprisoned by money would be a bad thing. I mean if we were all taken care off and given just as good education as the man standing next to us we could all have a bright future as opposed to some of us living in slums of on the streets.

This is incorrect. The real debate is, to what extent is capitalism practiced in the nation? Let me illustrate with two extremes. In a laissez faire free market society, everyone has the right to own property and create a business and participate in markets.

The government exists to regulate abuses that endanger freedom, to the maximum extent possible, particularly in balancing corporate power against small business and individual industry. Conversely, in a communist society, only the state may engage in capitalism, either internally or externally. The economy is centrally planned and managed, not necessarily in accordance with market forces, but usually in line with political considerations.

The net effect is that the state assumes the character of a corporation and the leader becomes the CEO. Fidel Castro, for instance, is worth close to a billion dollars, primarily because of the state controlled tourism industry. Moreover, capitalism is essentially an economic concept. Hegel influenced most leftist movements, fascism mostly in the aspects of nation and God, and Marxism in the concepts of the supremacy of the state and class development.

In many ways, Communism is a religion. Because it is a utopian vision that has yet to be realized, according to its proponents. But it turned out to be a lie, and the general tendencies of socialists is iconoclasm. They abandon their past heroes and bury them in the sea of forgetfulness as the abuses and failures of the regime come to light, usually after the regime is replaced. Fascism is basically the freezing of a Marxian nation into a static intermediate form of revolutionary thinking, one that never leads to end-state communism, such as in North Korea.

But one that nevertheless captures all the dismal contradictions and failings of full-blown Marxism. So whilst promoting a stateless society, communism maintains state ownership and custody of everything? Sure you can make it totalitarian, but you can adapt the system to make the top-leaders more open to new ones.

In fact there are a lot of alternatives to make the calculuum. Why capitalists or defenders of this system should be treated nice in a revolutionary state?

Because a socialist state provides good condidionts of life to its citizes, provides free health care, free and ultra-quality education, good streets, good public transports, no violence in the streets. What we have now in Russia? The presumption of innocence was replaced by a universalized presumption of guilt.

Utopian ideals were used to legitimize abuses against political enemies defined only in connection with the interests of a self-appointed revolutionary vanguard. Paranoia regarding infiltration, subversion, and treason were enduring features of all communist political cultures, from Russia and China, to Romania and Yugoslavia. Leninist parties in France and Italy, officially playing the democratic parliamentary game after World War II, were no less tolerant of deviation from the orthodox line than similar extreme right institutions, with the sole difference that in keeping with the nature of the game, these quasi- democratic parties could not physically liquidate alleged spies and agents.

There is no spectacular revelation in The Black Book: what has emerged from the secret archives of the former Soviet bloc countries confirms the long-held view that communists engaged in revolutionary civil war to accomplish the total transformation of the economy, society, and culture. What is original, is the comprehensive and systematic analysis and interpretation of the crimes and repression associated with Leninist practices in the 20th century.

When comparing the number of victims of the communist regimes between 85 and million with the number of people who perished under or because of Nazism 25 million , however, The Black Book's editor, Stephane Courtois, minimized a few crucial facts. First, as an expansionist global phenomenon, Communism has existed since its inception in until the present time in some countries i.

National Socialism lasted between and Second, what the price in terms of victims of Nazism would had been, had Hitler won the war, is not known. The logical hypothesis, however, is that in addition to Jews and Gypsies, millions of Slavs and other "racially unfit" individuals would have been killed. Third, in the case of communism, there is a dynamic that could, and did, contrast the original promise to the sordidly criminal practice.

In other words, the ideology allowed a space for potential reforms - even for socialism with a human face - within the communist world. Such a thing would have been unthinkable under Nazism. The chasm between theory and practice, or at least between the moral-humanist Marxian or socialist creed, and the Leninist, Stalinist or Maoist and Khmer Rouge experiments was more than an intellectual fantasy.

Sovietism and Nazism were equally scornful of traditional morality and legality in their drive to eliminate "enemies," but for Lenin and his followers "re-education," cruel and humiliating as it was, did offer at least some chance for survival to either the "class enemy" or to their offspring.

This was not the case with Nazism and its treatment of the Jews. The problem with Leninism and later Stalinism , as evinced in by Karl Kautsky and Rosa Luxemburg, was the sanctification of the ultimate ends, and thus the creation of an amoral universe in which the most terrible crimes are justified in the name of glowing "tomorrows.

No less important, the appeals of communism were linked to the extraordinary power of its ideology and the core myth of the Party as carrier of Reason in History. No other revolutionary movement has been as successful as Leninism in turning the gnostic creed into a self-hypnotizing weapon. Leninist militants worldwide believed in the myth of the party with an ardor comparable only to the illuminates of religious millennial sects.

Analytical distinctions between them are certainly important, but the commonality in terms of complete contempt for the bourgeois state of law, human rights, and the universality of humankind regardless of spurious race and class distinction is beyond doubt. Therefore, fascist emphasizes national strength as the sole requirement for the good of a nation.

Similarly, the use of military and violent scheme to promote this ideology and to achieve the goal is a primary principle in fascism or right-wing political views.

Thus, the implied a goal of every fascist ruler is ultimate to rule the entire world. Figure 2: A Fascist Symbol — an axe bound in a bundle of wooden rods, a symbol of power over life or death through death penalty.

Moreover, according to the fascist view, political violence, war, and imperialism are means to achieve national rejuvenation. Therefore, militarism or the use of military actions is regarded as the sole means to accomplish these fascist goals, especially to keep the subjects obedient and within the framework.

As a result, there is lesser internal social revolts and revolutions. Similarly, since this is an authoritarian rule, there are no opposition political parties or elections. Communism is a political philosophy or an ideology that advocates social equality through the equal distribution of production and profit among the community. This will eventually lead to equality in the society by diminishing social class divisions by empowering the working class.

Communism can be therefore defined as a political as well as an economic philosophy, which came into being in the mid th century. This philosophy was initiated and developed notably by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.

Figure 3: A Communism Symbol. Political System A communist society is stateless, classless and governed directly by the people. This, however, has never been achieved. In practice, they have been totalitarian in nature, with a central party governing society. One charismatic leader has absolute authority. Often the symbol of the state. Advisers to Government are generally picked by merit rather than election.

Cronyism common. Private Property Abolished. The concept of property is negated and replaced with the concept of commons and ownership with "usership". Nominally permitted. Contingent upon service, obedience, or usefulness to the State.

Definition International theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, with actual ownership ascribed to the community or state. Rejection of free markets and extreme distrust of Capitalism in any form.

An extremely nationalistic, authoritarian state usually led by one person at the head of one party. No democratic election of representatives. No free market. No individualism or individual glory. The State controls of the press and all other media. Economic Coordination Economic planning coordinates all decisions regarding investment, production and resource allocation.

Planning is done in terms of physical units instead of money. Businesses are nominally privately owned; the State dictates outputs and investments. Planning is based on projected labor output rather than money. Social Structure All class distinctions are eliminated. A society in which everyone is both the owners of the means of production and their own employees. Strict class structure believed necessary to prevent chaos Italian Fascist.

All class distinctions are eliminated German Nazi. Italian Fascism was not racist in doctrine originally. Religion Abolished - all religious and metaphysics is rejected. Fascism is a civic religion: citizens worship the state through nationalism. Ownership Structure The means of production are commonly-owned, meaning no entity or individual owns productive property. Importance is ascribed to "usership" over "ownership". The means of production are nominally privately owned but directed by the State.

Private ownership of business is contingent upon submission to the direction and interests of the State. Free Choice Either the collective "vote" or the state's rulers make economic and political decisions for everyone else.

In practice, rallies, force, propaganda etc. The individual is considered meaningless; they must submit to the decisions of the leadership. Economic System The means of production are held in common, negating the concept of ownership in capital goods.

Production is organized to provide for human needs directly without any use for money. Communism is predicated upon a condition of material abundance. Autarky national self-sufficiency. Keynesian mostly. Large public works, deficit spending. Anti trade union and syndicalism. Strongly against international financial markets and usury. Way of Change Government in a Communist-state is the agent of change rather than any market or desire on the part of consumers.

Change by government can be swift or slow, depending on change in ideology or even whim. Government in a fascist state is the agent of change rather than any market or desire on the part of consumers. Change by government can be swift or slow, depending on a change in labor output or even at the whim of the dictator.

Discrimination In theory, all members of the state are considered equal to one another. Belief in one superior race Nazism. Mental or physical handicaps.

Mental illness. Jews Nazi. Means of control Theoretically there is no state control.